Main CPGW Record
Place of Birth: Skipton, Yorkshire
Service No: 265693
Regiment / Corps / Service: Duke of Wellington’s (West Riding Regiment)
Battalion / Unit: 'A' Coy 2/6th Battalion
Division: 62nd (2/West Riding) Division
Date of Death: 1917-05-03
CWGC Grave / Memorial Reference: Bay 6.
CWGC Cemetery: ---
CWGC Memorial: ARRAS MEMORIAL
Non-CWGC Burial: ---
Local War Memorial: SKIPTON, YORKSHIRE
Herbert Maudsley was the son of Margaret Maudsley (born Skipton, Yorkshire, c. 1845), the daughter of John and Isabella Maudsley. Herbert may have been distantly related to Private Harry Maudsley (24904) (q.v.).
1891 Skipton, Yorkshire Census: 6, Old Bunker's Hill - Herbert Maudsley, aged 5 years, born Skipton. [Herbert and his brother Thomas, were living with their mother, Margaret and her father, John Maudsley, widower.]
1901 Skipton, Yorkshire Census: 3a, Browns Yard - Herbert Maudsley, aged 15 years, born Skipton, son of Margaret Maudsley.
1911 Skipton, Yorkshire Census: 18, Westmorland Street - Herbert Maudsley, aged 25 years, born Skipton. [Herbert was boarding with Bartholomew and Margaret Ann Peacock.]
Herbert was married to Elizabeth Smith in 1912.
British Army WW1 Medal Rolls Index Cards: Sgt Herbert Maudsley, 265693, W. Rid. R. [Herbert received the Territorial Force War Medal.]
British Army WW1 Medal and Award Rolls: Sgt Herbert Maudsley, 265693, 2/6 W. Rid. R. Pres dead 3.5.17.
Army Registers of Soldiers' Effects: Sergt Herbert Maudsley, 265693, 2/6th Bn W. Riding. Date and Place of Death: On or since 3.5.17. Death pres'd. To whom Authorised/Amount Authorised: Widow - Elizabeth. £25 4s. 10d.
Data Source: Craven’s Part in the Great War - original CPGW book entryView Entry in CPGW Book
Entry in West Yorkshire Pioneer Illustrated War Record:
MAUDSLEY, Sgt. Herbert, aged 33, West Riding Regiment, of Skipton, missing for nine months and now presumed dead.
Click the thumbnail below to view a larger image.
Sergeant Herbert MAUDSLEY
Regiment / Corps / Service Badge: Duke of Wellington’s (West Riding Regiment)
Divisional Sign / Service Insignia: 62nd (2/West Riding) Division
Soldiers Died Data for Soldier Records
Born: Skipton, Yorks
Regiment: Duke of Wellington's (West Riding Regiment)
Battalion: 2/6th Battalion
Died Date: 03/05/17
Died How: Killed in action
Theatre of War: France & Flanders
CWGC Data for Soldier Records
Country of Service: United Kingdom
Service Number: 265693
Regiment: Duke of Wellington's (West Riding Regiment)
Unit: "A" Coy. 2nd/6th Bn.
Died Date: 03/05/1917
Additional Information: Husband of Elizabeth Maudsley, of 37, Rowland St., Skipton, Yorks.
View Additional Text For Soldier Records
THE HISTORY OF THE 62nd (WEST RIDING) DIVISION 1914-1919 Volume 1, by Everard Wyrall (John Lane the Bodley Head Limited Vigo Street, London, W.)
THE BATTLE OF BULLECOURT:
3rd – 17th May, 1917.
During the three weeks following the first attack on Bullecourt on 11th April, the 62nd Division was engaged in trench warfare, and in preparing for another attack on the Hindenburg Line which had been ordered to take place on various successive dates and subsequently postponed, until it was definitely decided that Bullecourt should again be attacked on the 3rd May…
In the centre of the Divisional front, the troops of the 186th Infantry Brigade reached their allotted places by 3-30 a.m., though during the evening of the 2nd, the enemy’s artillery had caused considerable trouble – all forward telephone and telegraph wires having been cut and communication interrupted. The Signallers, however, repaired them and communication was re-established. The 2/5th Duke of Wellington’s (Lieut.-Col. F.W. Best) were on the right, the 2/6th (Lieut.-Col. S.W. Ford) on the left: the 2/7th Battalion (Lieut.-Col. F.G.C. Chamberlin) was in rear of the 2/5th and the 2/4th (Lieut.-Col. H.E. Nash) in the rear of 2/6th.
Three Companies of the 2/8th West Yorks. were formed up in rear of the 2/4th and 2/7th Battalions Duke of Wellington’s Regt., the remaining Company of the 2/8th having been detailed as a carrying party was in rear of the three Companies. The 213th Machine Gun Company supported the 186th Brigade.
On the left of the Divisional front, held by the 187th Infantry Brigade, the 2/4th Battalion York and Lancs. Regt. (Lieut.-Col. F. St. J. Blacker) was on the right, the 2/5th King’s Own Yorks. Light Infantry (Lieut.-Col. W. Watson) with two Companies of the 2/4th Battalion (Lieut.-Col. R.E. Power) of the same Regiment in rear of the two front line battalions, and the remaining two Companies of the 2/4th K.O.Y.L.I. were in rear of the 2/5th Battalion, detailed for ‘carrying’ duties. The 208th Machine Gun Company was in support.
The taping and forming up operations were carried out without serious casualties and were completed by 3-30 a.m., but Lieut.-Col. F. St. J. Balcker, D.S.O., commanding the Hallamshires, was wounded on the forming up line.
Shortly after two o’clock in the morning the moon disappeared and the night turned to inky blackness, but fifteen minutes before Zero all was ready for the attack. At this period the enemy put down a very heavy barrage on the 185th Infantry Brigade, which gradually spread along the whole front.
At Zero the creeping barrage opened on the enemy’s position and the assaulting troops began to move forward immediately. But now an unexpected difficulty presented itself: the warm weather had baked the ground hard and as the shells fell, churning it up, clouds of dust filled the air, and with smoke from the guns, and the smoke bombs, the objectives were hidden from the advancing troops, and there was much loss of direction.
The 2/5th West Yorks. on the left of the 185th Brigade front speedily captured the enemy’s first line trench, the wire entanglements having been well cut. The 2/6th Battalion, however, was not as fortunate: Colonel Hastings’ Battalion had been met by very heavy machine-gun fire which caused many casualties, and in the smoke and confusion sheared off towards the left, overlapping the right of the 2/5th Battalion. Meanwhile the latter had pushed on towards the centre of the village and had established two posts, one at U.27.b.6.8. and the other at U.21.d.5.0. At this point touch was lost with the 2/6th Battalion, though it was eventually established about the church. A pigeon message timed 5-15 a.m. from an officer of the left Company of the third and fourth waves of the 2/5th Battalion which reached Divisional Headquarters stated that the writer was in the communication trench at U.21.d.5.5. with about forty of his men.
On the left of the 185th Infantry Brigade, the 186th had accomplished only part of its task. The 2/5th Duke of Wellington’s found the wire cut and no difficulty was experienced in reaching the second German trench of the first objective. Here touch was obtained with the left of the 185th Brigade, and maintained for several hours until broken by enfilade machine-gun fire from both flanks. But the 2/6th Duke of Wellington’s found the wire uncut and their attack was held up. Hostile shell-fire and the rear waves closing in on the leading waves, added to the confusion and all that could be done was to occupy some shell holes in front of the enemy’s wire. An attempt was then made to cut the second belt of wire, but again machine-gun fire from the north, and the enemy’s activity with bombs frustrated this endeavour and finally the shell-holes were established as posts.
The 2/5th Duke’s had by this time established themselves in the enemy’s front line trench from U.21.d.1.0. to U.20.d.2.4. and had been reinforced by the 2/8th West Yorks.
Similarly on the left of the 186th Brigade, the 187th had met with success – and failure. The 2/5th York and Lancs. Regt. reached its first objective without difficulty, but the 2/4th Battalion was hung up by the thick wire entanglements which were insufficiently cut. In seeking to find a way through the Battalion moved off to its left and became intermingled with the 2/5th Battalion, whose right flank was ‘in the air.’ At about 4-20 a.m. Lieut.-Col. W. Watson, commanding the 2/5th K.O.Y.L.I. was killed as he was gallantly rallying his men and leading them forward.
For a while no reports from the right flank of the attack were received at Divisional Headquarters, and nothing could be ascertained as to what was taking place in the village of Bullecourt. At 6-50 a.m. the situation was so obscure that the protective barrage was ordered to remain on the second objective until a further advance could be organized. A little later (at 7 a.m.) the situation of the 185th Brigade appears to be as follows: Posts had been established at U.21.d.5.5. with a certain number of men further east along the Support line at U.21.d.5.9., U.27.b.6.8. and at the church (U.28.a.0.9.): the whole of the German front line trench as far east as U.27.b. had been occupied. Touch was maintained with the 2/5th Duke of Wellington’s Regt., on the western side of the village and in the trench running south from the Crucifix. But of the 2/6th West Yorks. little was known, and all attempts to communicate with or reach the probable position of the Battalion, failed. Large numbers of men of the Battalion – dead and wounded – were found in front of the German wire. A Company of the 2/7th West Yorks. was sent forward to try to reach their comrades of the 2/6th, but the men were met by a murderous machine-gun fire which swept the line of the advance and after having suffered heavy casualties the Company withdrew to the Railway Embankment.
Repeated attempts by the 186th and 187th Brigades to penetrate the enemy’s positions were frustrated, and at noon the little party of the 2/5th Duke’s and 2/8th West Yorks., were bombed out of their portion of the trench and were forced to take shelter in shell holes south and south-west of Bullecourt. The advance by the 2/5th K.O.Y.L.I., under Major O.C. Watson, at first progressed, but was eventually checked by heavy machine-gun fire and a continuous H.E. barrage.
At mid-day the situation was as follows: about fifty men per battalion of the 186th Infantry Brigade had found shelter on the Railway Line U.26.c. and d., the remainder of the Brigade was in the Sunken Road in U.27.a.5.8. and U.20.d.9.4.: of the 187th Brigade elements were in the Sunken Road in U.20.b. and in shell holes in U.20.c. and d.: the Company of 2/5th West Yorks. (185th Brigade) which had been driven out of the western side of Bullecourt, had also reached the Railway Line, the 2/7th West Yorks. were also at U.27.c. and d., on the Railway Line: but there was still no news of the 2/6th West Yorks.
Just after 5 o’clock in the evening orders from Divisional Headquarters to the three Infantry Brigades contained instructions to the Brigadiers to make every effort to reorganize their battalions on the line of their original fronts, in their own sectors: the 7th Division was to take over the front held by the 185th Infantry Brigade as soon as possible. The same orders stated that the VIIth Corps had taken Chérisy and the 2nd Australian Division (on the right of the 62nd Division) was in occupation of the Hindenburg Line from U.23.c.8.1. to U.22.d.6.3.
The failure of the 62nd Division to capture Bullecourt was due largely to a fault which certainly cannot be charged to the gallant troops who stormed the village and the Hindenburg Line in the vicinity. Neither could the Divisional Staff, which had laboured to make all arrangements as complete as possible, be blamed. It was due principally to an error in tactics which had so often failed in the earlier years of the war – notably at Festubert in 1915. The Australian Division on the right of the 62nd Division did not launch its attack side by side with the 2/6th West Yorks., the flanking battalion of the West Riding Division. There was a gap – a fatal gap – in the line of attack between the Colonials and the Yorkshiremen, the former having decided to attack the first objective frontally, only as far to the left as U.23.d.6.3., and then bomb down the Hindenburg Line westwards to the left boundary where touch was to be gained with the 185th Infantry Brigade. Thus some hundreds of yards of the enemy’s positions (unfortunately that portion which was very strongly defended by machine-guns) was left free to enfilade the 2/6th West Yorks. as that Battalion advanced: which indeed happened. In all justice to the Australian troops it must be noted that they reached their objective, but before they got there the West Yorkshiremen had been cut up and of those brave fellows who had penetrated the village the greater number had either been killed, wounded, or taken prisoner, only a hundred survivors getting back to their own trenches.
The inky blackness of the night, which caused much confusion during the forming-up operations, also contributed to the failure of the assault, many of the troops losing themselves and being entirely ignorant of the direction of the enemy’s trenches.
The enemy was in considerable strength, the 49th Reserve Division and the 27th Division was holding the Hindenburg Line between Fontaine and Riencourt (inclusive). The latter had with it the 1st Musketeen (Automatic Rifle) Battalion.
Many deeds of gallantry were witnessed during that attack, and the Division emerged from its first set battle sorely tried and tested and badly mauled, but with many proofs of its fighting qualities… The casualties of the 62nd (W.R.) Division on the 3rd May were: 116 officers and 2,860 other ranks, killed, wounded and missing…
The 62nd had been ‘Blooded’!
At dusk on the 3rd, the 185th Infantry Brigade was relieved by the 22nd Infantry Brigade (7th Division), only the 2/7th West Yorks. remaining in the line under the command of the General Officer Commanding 7th Division.
The remnants of the 2/5th, 2/6th and 2/8th West Yorks. were withdrawn to caves in Ecoust, to reorganize: on the following day they marched to Ervillers. The 186th and 187th Brigades remained in the line, the 62nd Divisional front now extending from the Mory – Ecoust – Bullecourt Road (inclusive) to the left of the Vth Corps boundary, Judas Farm – Sensee River, to along the road at T.24.a.9.4. – U.14.c.2.9…
The final attack on Bullecourt began on the 12th May when the 185th Infantry Brigade assisted the 7th (British) and 5th (Australian) Divisions, by attacking the enemy’s strong point at the Crucifix.
The 2/7th Battalion West Yorks. was detailed for this operation, the 185th Trench Mortar Battery and one Section of the 212th Machine-Gun Company co-operating. Two Companies of the Battalion – B and C – attacked the Crucifix at Zero (3-40 a.m.) pus 26 minutes, but for a while no information of the situation of the attacking troops was obtainable. The 91st Brigade (7th Division) had reached the centre of the village, capturing a few Germans, but here very heavy machine-gun fire held up any further advance. About 6-30 a.m., however, an aeroplane report was received at 62nd Divisional Headquarters which stated that men of the 2/7th could be seen well dug in at the Crucifix. But from this period onwards, throughout the day, nothing could be ascertained, it being impossible to gain touch with the gallant West Yorkshiremen holding the post at the Crucifix. Possibly one of those isolated fights to a finish which were not uncommon in the War, but of which no authentic records are in existence, took place. For at 8 p.m. another aeroplane reported that the Germans once more held the Crucifix. At 10 o’clock that night patrols which attempted to reach the post were driven back, thus confirming the aeroplane report. Subsequently a few odd men returned through the lines of the 1st South Staffords (7th Division), having lost their way, but of the two officers and thirty-one other ranks who were known to be holding the Crucifix none returned nor was any further information gained concerning their fate. Five killed, thirty-one missing and thirty-two wounded were the casualties suffered by the 2/7th West Yorks. in this affair…
View Craven Herald Articles
18 May 1917
SKIPTON SERGEANT BELIEVED TO BE A PRISONER
Mrs. Maudsley, 37, Rowland Street, Skipton who has been much concerned as to the fate of her husband, Sergeant Herbert Maudsley, West Riding Regiment, has now received a letter from another sergeant which contains the following passages:– “During the recent fighting on our front, our Company went out to meet the Germans in a very strong position. We had some men wounded and some missing, but few killed. Your dear husband was last seen leading his men on and doing good work. We suppose your husband to be a prisoner, as he was seen in the German lines and we have no reports as to anything else, so we will not give up hope yet. We don’t think for a minute that anything else has happened to him. Herbert’s company is very much missed by not only the officers and sergeants, but by all who knew him, and if any word is heard of him I will let you know as quick as I can. He was a good chum and soldier and a good Christian leader amongst the men, and as I said was doing his duty nobly when last seen by me. – Sergeant S. Hodgson.”
Sergeant Maudsley joined up in 1914, previous to which he was employed at Belle Vue Mills. He was a deacon of the Baptist Church and an active worker in the Sunday School.
30 November 1917
SKIPTON BAPTISTS’ MEMORIAL TO SOLDIERS
On Tuesday afternoon a three days’ sale of work was commenced in the Baptist School, Otley Street, Skipton, in aid of the Soldiers’ Memorial Extension Fund, by means of which it is intended to extend the premises in memory of the young men associated with the place who have paid the supreme sacrifice in the war. Seventy young men belonging to the church and school are at present serving with the Colours, of whom two, H. Maudsley (deacon and Sunday School superintendent) and H. Birch have been missing since May 3rd and August 17th respectively, while the following have given their lives in the great cause:– S. Bishop, J. McIntyre, J. Duckworth, G.A. Wilson, H. Greenwood, D. Collins, B. Peel (Sunday School secretary), H. Scott, A. Bruce, J. Metcalfe, A. Gill, W. Barraclough, E. Platt and W. Ireland…
01 March 1918
MAUDSLEY – Missing for nine months and death now officially presumed, Sergeant Herbert Maudsley, West Riding Regiment, of Skipton, aged 33 years.
01 March 1918
MISSING NINE MONTHS, NOW PRESUMED KILLED – SERGEANT H. MAUDSLEY, SKIPTON
Missing for over nine months, Sergeant Herbert Maudsley, West Riding Regiment, of Skipton, is now presumed by the War Office to have been killed last Spring, an intimation to this effect having been received by his wife, who lives at 37 Rowland Street. In a letter to Mrs. Maudsley last May, Sergeant S. Hodgson stated that Sergeant Maudsley’s Company went out to meet the Germans in a very strong position, and while some men were wounded and some were missing, few were killed. Sergeant Maudsley, he said, was last seen leading his men and doing good work, and as he was seen in the German lines he was believed to have been taken prisoner.
“Herbert’s company,” he added, “is very much missed by not only the officers and sergeants, but by all who knew him. He was a good chum and soldier and a good Christian leader amongst the men, and was doing his duty nobly when last seen.”
Thirty-three years of age, Sergeant Maudsley enlisted in the first year of the war and went to the Front in February 1917. Previously he was employed at Belle Vue Mills, and was a deacon of the Skipton Baptist Church and an active worker in the Sunday School.
23 February 1923
ODDFELLOWS’ WAR MEMORIAL
UNVEILING CEREMONY AT A SKIPTON LODGE
OVER 200 WHO SERVED
There was a large attendance of local members of the Independent Order of Oddfellows at the Friendly Societies’ Hall, Skipton, on Saturday afternoon, on the occasion of the unveiling of a war memorial to the members of the Loyal Traveller’s Friend Lodge, I.O.O.F, M.U., who fell in the war.
The Memorial takes the form of a beautifully designed scroll within an oak frame with a glass front, the work of Mr. H. Spencer, junr., and it bears the inscription:–
LOYAL/TRAVELLER’S FRIEND LODGE,/SKIPTON DISTRICT ./I.O.O.F. ROLL OF HONOUR M.U./OF/THOSE MEMBERS OF THIS LODGE WHO FOUGHT FOR THEIR KING AND COUNTRY TO UPHOLD THE SACRED CAUSES OF BROTHERHOOD AND HUMANITY IN THE GREAT WAR, 1914–1918.
Below the inscription are the names of 173 members who served in the war, and of the 40 members who were killed. The names of the fallen occupy a central position on the scroll, and above them are the following words:–
OF THOSE WHO MADE THE
THEIR HEARTS ARE LIFTED UP
THAT HAVE FOREKNOWN
THE UTTER PRICE,
THEIR HEARTS BURN
UPWARD AS A FLAME
OF SPLENDOUR AND OF
The names of the fallen are as follows:– H. Armstrong, J.J. Brown, J. Barrett, Robt. Brown, W.W. Bell, A. Clayton, W.H. Coles, T.C. Chew, Tom Downes, T.M. Drummond, Jos. Emmott, Thos. Edmondson, J. Easterby, F. Gallagher, J.W. Garwood, G.E. Godwin, S.J. Hargreaves, M. Hargreaves, A. Hebden, J. Hebden, A. Hawkswell, T.E. Inman, M. Lund, R.C. [R.G.] Metcalfe, Hbt. Maudsley, Hy. Maudsley, A.J. Pimnock [Pinnock], H.Y. [Harry] Riley, T.W. Storey, J.H. Stewart, R. Spencer, J.W. Shuttleworth, Wm. Tempest, Hbt. Thompson, Fred Thornton, J.W. Varley, John Ward, J.A. Whittaker, J.W. Whittaker, and R.D. Whittaker.
The Unveiling Ceremony
The unveiling ceremony was presided over by Bro. Thos. Bellamy, and was performed by Bro. Amos Culpan, Prov. C.S., and a simple service included the singing of the hymns, ‘O God our help’ and Kipling’s Recessional, ‘God of our fathers,’ and the reading of a portion of Scripture, and the offering of a prayer by Bro. James Greenwood, of Bradford, and formerly of Skipton.
Bro. Bellamy observed that those members of the Lodge whom they were met to honour went into battle, suffered untold privations, and, in many cases, made the supreme sacrifice. They gave their lives in defence of their homes and their country. Further than that, they gave their lives for justice and freedom, and in order that we might live. It was the duty of Oddfellows, equally as much as other sections of the community, to do everything within their power to make the country better for that sacrifice. “In the time of our prosperity,” concluded Bro. Bellamy, “never let us forget those who served us in the time of our adversity.”
A Lesson of the War
Prior to unveiling the memorial, Bro. Culpan described the ceremony he had been asked to perform as one not unattended by sorrow. It was an occasion upon which one felt a desire to make their Order better for the sacrifice of its members, and to extend the true spirit of brotherhood. In nearly 4,000 of their Lodges they would find a roll of honour. Over 22,000 of their members made the supreme sacrifice, and thousands of others were ruined and shattered in health and without prospects for the future. Each and all of them ought to perform some daily service that would make the sacrifice of those men worth while. One result of the terrible ordeal of 1914 to 1918 was the creation of a better feeling between men, and a desire to break down the class barriers that formerly existed. That was one of the great lessons of the war.
View West Yorkshire Pioneer Articles
18 May 1917
SKIPTON SERGEANT BELIEVED PRISONER OF WAR
Sergeant H. Maudsley, of the West Riding Regiment, husband of Mrs. Maudsley, of 37, Rowland Street, Skipton, is believed to have beep taken a prisoner of war. In a letter to his wife, Sergt. S. Hodgson writes:– “I feel it my duty to inform you of your husband. During the recent fighting on our front our company went out to meet the Germans, who were in a very strong position. We had some men wounded and some missing, but few killed. Your dear husband was last seen leading his men on, and doing good work. We suppose your husband to be a prisoner with him being seen near the German line. We have not any reports as to anything else, so we will not give up hope yet. We don’t think for a minute that anything else has happened to him. Herbert’s company is very much missed by not only the officers and sergeants, but by all who knew him, and if any word is heard of him I will let you know as quick as I can. We can only hope for the best. Keep up your spirits, and no doubt all will be better than we think. Herbert was a good chum, soldier, and a good Christian leader amongst the men. He was doing his duty nobly when last seen by me.”
Sergeant Maudsley enlisted in 1914, prior to which he was employed at Belle Vue Mills. He was closely connected with the Baptist Church, being a deacon of the church, and a worker in the Sunday School.
01 March 1918
MAUDSLEY – Reported missing since May 3rd, 1917, now presumed killed, Sergt. Herbert Maudsley, of the Duke of Wellington’s West Riding Regiment, husband of Mrs. Maudsley, of 37, Rowland Street, Skipton, aged 33.
01 March 1918
SERGT. H. MAUDSLEY PRESUMED KILLED
Mrs. Maudsley, of 37, Rowland Street, Skipton, has received an official intimation from the War Office, presuming the death of her husband, Sergeant Herbert Maudsley, of the Duke of Wellington’s West Riding Regiment, who had been missing since May 3rd, 1917. At the time he was reported missing Mrs. Maudsley received the following letter from Sergt. S. Hodgson:– “I feel it my duty to inform you of your husband. During the recent fighting on our front our company went out to meet the Germans, who were in a very strong position. We had some men wounded and some missing, but few were killed. Your dear husband was last seen leading his men on and doing good work. We suppose your husband to be a prisoner with him being seen near the German lines. We have not any reports as to anything else, so we will not give up hopes yet. We don’t think for a minute that anything else has happened to him. Herbert’s company is very much missed by not only the officers and sergeants, but by all who know him, and if any word is heard of him I will let you know as quick as I can. We can only hope for the best. Keep up your spirits, and no doubt all will be better than we think. Herbert was a good chum, soldier and a good Christian leader amongst the men. He was doing his duty nobly when last seen by me.” Numerous inquiries had since been made as to his whereabouts, but the only news received was that he was still missing. Sergt. Maudsley, who was 33 years of age, enlisted in 1914, prior to which he was employed at Belle Vue Mills. He was closely connected with the Baptist Church, being a deacon of the church, and worker in the Sunday School. He went out to France in February of last year.
Comment on this Soldier Record
You can leave comments on this soldier record. Please note all comments will be manually approved before they appear on the website.